Legal Opinion
United States v. Panepinto
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 4, 1970No. Nos. 17529-17531PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Baglino, Tronco and Oran-gio were convicted, after trial to a jury, of conspiracy and concealment of stolen goods that had been moving in interstate commerce, in contravention of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2315. The individual appeals of Tronco and Orangio, taken from the judgments of conviction entered on July 30, 1968, and of Baglino, taken from the judgment of conviction entered on August 2, 1968, were consolidated for purposes of argument and opinion.
The Government’s chief witness was a co-defendant (Warren), who had entered a plea of guilty prior to trial.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. SomersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. John Digilio, in No. 75-2218. Appeal of Harry Lupo, in No. 75-2219. Appeal of Peter Szwandrak, in No. 75-2220Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- United States v. Donald E. Belle. Appeal of Donald BelleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.