Malik v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
Muhammad Saeed Malik seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigrations Appeals (“BIA”) sustaining his removability from the United States. Malik argues the BIA erred in affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) that he obtained a visa through a fraudulent marriage and that 8 U.S.C. § 1256(a) did not bar the institution of removal proceedings *255against him. We will deny the petition for review.
I
Malik is a native and citizen of Pakistan who entered the United States in April 1999 as a legal permanent resident (“LPR”) after receiving…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saidou Dia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- En Hui Huang v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Sang Chul Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adams v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Saliba v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Fatih SonmezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Orlando Fernandez Taveras v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Baljinder Singh v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.