Legal Opinion
City of Creve Coeur v. Nottebrok
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 25, 2011No. ED 96396PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Mary Nottebrok (Car Owner) appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding Car Owner guilty of violating the City of Creve Coeur’s (the City) “red light violation” ordinance. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural History
On August 11, 2009, Car Owner’s vehicle was photographed by the City’s “red light” camera as the vehicle traveled through an intersection near the northbound Interstate 270 off ramp at Olive Boulevard. The electric signal light was red when Car Owner’s vehicle entered the intersection. Ten days later, the City issued a Notice of Violation of Public Safety at Intersection…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jamison v. State, Department of Social Services, Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Bezayiff v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- City of Kansas City v. Hertz CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Damon v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Edwards v. City of EllisvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Unverferth v. City of FlorissantMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ballard v. City of Creve CoeurMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.