Legal Opinion

City of Kansas City v. Hertz Corporation

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 10, 1973No. 57239PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARDGETT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, City of Kansas City, Missouri, a municipal corporation (hereafter City), appeals from the judgment of acquittal entered in favor of defendant-respondent Hertz Corporation (hereafter Hertz).

This case involves a construction of a traffic ordinance of the City of Kansas

City with respect to the owner’s liability for illegally parked cars. The question is whether the ordinance imposes liability on the owner-lessor of a car when the car is being permissively used by a lessee and is illegally parked and, if so, whether the ordinance is in violation of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Commonwealth v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. OberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. City of St. Louis v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walter Harvey Ballard, Jr. v. Honorable Fad Wilson, Judge, Municipal Court Number Three and City of Houston, Texas, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. City of Sioux City v. Michael Jon JacobsmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. Sarah Tupper, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Iowa City v. NolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. City of Chicago v. Hertz Commercial Leasing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API