Legal Opinion

DGR Associates, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 13, 2010No. 10-396CPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.

In this bid protest, Plaintiff DGR Associates, Inc. (“DGR”) challenges the Department of the Air Force’s decision to conduct an 8(a) program small business set-aside procurement for housing maintenance, inspection, and repair seivices at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. DGR contends that the Air Force violated the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 657a(b)(2)(B) (2006), by not giving priority to HUBZone small business concerns when there is a reasonable expectation that two or more such concerns would submit offers and that the award could be made at a fair market…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Furniture By Thurston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Laboratory Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. DGR Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Defense Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Angelica Textile Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API