Legal Opinion

State v. Rivas

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 19, 2012No. 41416-3-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.

¶1 — Benjamin Rivas appeals his second degree assault1 and second degree malicious mischief2 convictions, arguing that (1) the State’s charging document was both legally and factually deficient and (2) the trial court’s malicious mischief jury instruction relieved the State of its burden of proving every essential element of the crime. We agree the charging document was deficient and we reverse Rivas’s malicious mischief conviction, but we affirm his second degree assault conviction.

FACTS

¶2 Rivas believed that someone driving a green Honda broke all of the windows out of his father’s van.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. GreshamWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. TylerWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. BenitezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State v. HassanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State of Washington v. Gary Bruce FarnworthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State v. K.R.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API