State of Washington v. Gary Bruce Farnworth
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtFearing, C.J.
¶1 Gary Farnworth II garnered forty-six payments of Washington Department of Labor and Industries (DLI) worker compensation benefits by certifying he engaged in no employment at a time when he labored at a *191car sales lot. The State aggregated the many thefts into three counts of first degree theft. Farnworth appeals, on numerous grounds, from two convictions for first degree theft. He argues that the trial court abused its discretion when denying a trial continuance, when admitting hearsay evidence, and when excluding some of his evidence. He also contends that the State lacked authority to…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FarnworthWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Alma VIDAURISupreme Court of Colorado · 2021