Legal Opinion

Stoehrer & Pratt Dodgem Corp. v. Glen Echo Park Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 19, 1926No. 2511PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Circuit Judge.

This case con-

cerns four patents, numbered respectively 1,339,299, 1,373,108, 1,467,959, and 1,478,-979. The first was issued to one Stock; the other three to Max and Harold Stoehrer. They are all owned by the appellant, the Stoehrer & Pratt Dodgem Corporation. It claims that they have been infringed by the appellee, the Glen Echo Park Company, Incorporated. Partners trading as Lusse Bros., upon their petition, the assent of the original litigants, and the order of the court, intervened. The parties will be herein called' the plaintiff, the defendant, and the interveners,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Rubber Tire Wheel Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Woodward Co. v. HurdSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Seim v. HurdSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1959
  3. Angier v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1931
  4. Hewes & Potter, Inc. v. MeyersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  5. Paschal v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API