Legal Opinion
Hewes & Potter, Inc. v. Meyerson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 3, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The petition to intervene is granted.
The plaintiff in this case is the owner of United States patent No. 1,419,137 and sues the defendant for alleged infringement thereof by the manufacture and sale of goods made under a license from the petitioner, S. Deiches & Co., an Illinois corporation, whieh seeks to intervene because—
1. In a litigation in the Seventh Circuit between it and the plaintiff’s predecessors in interest the patent in suit was declared invalid for want of novelty. Hewes et al. v. S. Deiches & Co. (D. C.) 14 F.(2d) 1020, affirmed 24 F.(2d) 503 (C. C. A.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Acme White Lead & Color Works v. Republic Motor Truck Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
- Stoehrer & Pratt Dodgem Corp. v. Glen Echo Park Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Hewes v. S. Deiches & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. 397 Cases, Etc., of Salad OilDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1936
- Hewes & Potter, Inc. v. MeyersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931