Legal Opinion

Woodward Co. v. Hurd

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1914No. 142PublishedCited by 7 opinions

CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the construction of a provision of immunity in the decree in a patent case and the rights of parties thereunder, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hughes

The recitals of the certificate with respect to the Grant patent, and the decrees which have been rendered in suits brought for its infringement, are identical with those contained in the certificate in Seim v. Hurd, decided this day, ante, p. 420. The questions certified are, in substance, the same. The facts of the present case are thus stated in the certificate:

“After the decision of the Supreme Court sustaining the Grant patent Hurd commenced this suit, joining with him the legal owner and licensee of the patent, against defendants residing and doing business within Hurd’s exclusive…

2Cited by7 opinions

Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Diamond Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
Aleograph Co. v. Electrical Research Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
Stoehrer & Pratt Dodgem Corp. v. Glen Echo Park Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.