Legal Opinion

Bonney v. Oregon State Penitentiary, Cor. Div.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 4, 1974PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Petitioner, an inmate at Oregon State Penitentiary, was found guilty by a disciplinary committee of threatening to Mil a guard and ordered to serve 180 days in segregation. Petitioner now seeks judicial review of the disciplinary committee’s decision pursuant to recently enacted OBS 421.195. ① The principal issues raised are whether the procedures followed in prison disciplinary hearings comply with statutory requirements and with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Corrections Division of the Department of Human Besources has, as required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Capitan v. CuppDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1972

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bartholomew v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Bonney v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Moore v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Bartholomew v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Bekins v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API