Dragoo v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
We are called upon in this prison discipline case to reconsider our decision in Bonney v. OSP, 16 Or App 509, 519 P2d 383, Sup Ct review allowed (1974), in light of the United States Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 US 539, 94 S Ct 2963, 41 L Ed 2d 935 (1974).
The questions in Bonney and Wolff concerned the minimum procedures required in prison disciplinary proceedings by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The answers in Bonney and Wolff were, broadly speaking, consistent. Due process does not require that an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bonney v. Oregon State Penitentiary, Cor. Div.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bekins v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Wilkerson v. Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Smith v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Reed v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Rodriquez v. Oregon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.