Legal Opinion

Laskey v. Sappi Fine Paper

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 8, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] George Laskey appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Jerome, H.O.) denying his petition to remedy discrimination. 39-A M.R.S.A. § 353 (2001). Laskey contends that his termination, pursuant to a policy which terminated employees with work restrictions as part of a downsizing program, constituted prohibited discrimination against him, violative of 39-A M.R.S.A. § 353. Because the hearing officer correctly determined that Laskey was not discriminated against for asserting a claim or right under the Workers’ Compensation Act, we affirm the decision.

I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Delano v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Lindsay v. Great Northern Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  3. Laskey v. SD Warren CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maietta v. Town of ScarboroughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. Doughty v. Work Opportunities Unlimited/Leddy GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Jandreau v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  4. Doughty v. Work Opportunities Unlimited/Leddy GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API