Legal Opinion
Maietta v. Town of Scarborough
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 27, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] The Town of Scarborough appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board (McCurry, HO) granting Michael Maietta’s petition to remedy discrimination pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 353 (2001). The Town contends that the hearing officer exceeded the bounds of his discretion in excluding •relevant evidence, finding discrimination and fashioning a remedy. Maietta has filed a motion to dismiss the petition for appellate review, asserting that it was untimely because the proceeding was an arbitration, pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 314 (2001), rather than a hearing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Delano v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Carroll v. Town of RockportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Lyons v. Baptist School of Christian TrainingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- State v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Gallant v. Boise Cascade Paper GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Avramovic v. R.C. Moore Transportation, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Doughty v. Work Opportunities Unlimited/Leddy GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Downing v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Lavoie v. Re-Harvest, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Spear v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.