Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Doughty v. Work Opportunities Unlimited/Leddy Group

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and LEVY, MEAD, and GORMAN, JJ.

Dissent: ALEXANDER, SILVER, and JABAR, JJ.

GORMAN, J.

[¶ 1] Charles Doughty appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board Hearing Officer (Collier; HO), granting his petition for award against Work Opportunities Unlimited/Leddy Group, an employment agency, but denying his petitions to remedy discrimination pursuant to 39-A M.R.S. § 353 (2010) against Work Opportunities and Poland Spring Water Co./Nestle Waters, Inc.1 Doughty contends mainly that the hearing officer erred by denying the petition to remedy discrimination against…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Timberlake v. Frigon & FrigonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Davis v. Scott Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Bourette v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. Marcoux v. Parker Hannifin/Nichols Portland DivisionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  5. Temm v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fuhrmann v. Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Island Tile & Marble, LLC v. BertrandSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  3. Ives Camargo's Case.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API