Legal Opinion
Jandreau v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 25, 2003No. WCB-03-19PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] Both Diane Jandreau and Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc., appeal from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board (McCurry, HO), granting Jandreau’s petition to remedy discrimination. Shaw’s contends that it was error to conclude that its termination of Jandreau’s employment pursuant to a facially neutral six-month absenteeism policy constituted discrimination in violation of 39-A M.R.S.A. § 353 (2001). Jandreau contends that the hearing officer erred in permitting Shaw’s to offset the backpay award by the amount of compensation already paid. Because we agree with Shaw’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Delano v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Lindsay v. Great Northern Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Morse v. Fleet Financial GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Thompson v. Claw Island FoodsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Dufour v. Internal Medicine AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maietta v. Town of ScarboroughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Lavoie v. Re-Harvest, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Ricardo Torres v. Precision Industries, P.I., d/b/a Precision Industries, Terry Hedrick and Vicki HedrickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014