Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 9, 1964No. 15PublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Two employees in respondent’s plant, Davis and Harmon, undertook to organize the employees who worked there. The Superintendent was advised by another employee, one Pate, that Davis and Harmon, while soliciting him for membership in the union, had told him the union would use dynamite to get in if the union did not acquire the authorizations. Respondent thereafter discharged Davis and Harmon because of these alleged state*22ments. An unfair labor practice proceeding was brought. The Board held that the discharges violated §§' 8 (a)(1) and 8 (a) (3) of the Act,161 Stat. 136,140-141,29 U. S. C. §§…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Cusano v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cambria Clay Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Cotton Mills (Division of J. P. Stevens Co.)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Waters v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Penny Bachelder Mark Bachelder v. America West Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Rush Pettway and Peter J. Wrenn v. American Cast Iron Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Patricia Villa v. Cavamezze Grill, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.