Legal Opinion

Village of Suring v. Suring State Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The decisive question in this case is, Was the action of the village or its officers in making the conveyance to the Suring Manufacturing Company ultra vires? The finding that the officers of the Suring State Bank and the bank, and the officers and the Suring Manufacturing Company had full notice, is amply sustained by the evidence. Neither the Suring Manufacturing Company nor the Suring State Bank is an innocent purchaser for value, and if the conveyance in question to the Suring Manufacturing Company was void as between it and the village it is void as to all parties. It is perfectly plain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lakeside Tumber Co. v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Bowman v. BarczakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hermann v. City of Lake MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Annuity & Pension BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. City of Frostburg v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API