Quackenbush v. City of Cheyenne
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Chief Justice.
This is an action brought on April 11, 1936, by taxpayers against the City of Cheyenne, its mayor and commissioners, for a declaratory judgment as to the validity of transactions hereinafter mentioned. The trial court declared them valid, and an appeal has been taken by the plaintiffs, appellants herein, from the judgment entered herein.
The petition discloses the following facts: The plaintiffs are citizens and taxpayers of the City of Cheyenne. The City is a municipal corporation, operating under a special charter, but also under the commission form of government, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Ladner v. SiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Haesloop v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Brown v. NelmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hermann v. City of Lake MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Grady v. City of LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re City of WarwickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
- Kalmbach v. City of MobridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Ross v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.