Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Royal Motor Sales, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 2004No. 82A04-0309-CV-486PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Sandra Wilson appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Royal Motor Sales, Inc. ("Royal"). Wilson raises a number of issues, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred when it determined as a matter of law that Royal had disclaimed all implied warranties. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts most favorable to Wilson, the non-moving party, follow. On May 26, 2001, Wilson purchased a 2000 Daewoo Nubria from Royal. The window sticker 1 on the car did not indicate the car was being sold "As Is", rather it indicated it was being sold…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Newman v. DeiterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- DeVoe Chevrolet-Cadillac, Inc. v. CartwrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tankersley v. Parkview Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Roberts v. Homelite Division of Textron, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. AlexanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Beatty v. LaFountaineIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Lacy-McKinney v. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dickerson v. StrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- LDT Keller Farms, LLC v. Brigitte Holmes Livestock Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.