Legal Opinion

Lacy-McKinney v. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2010No. 71A03-0912-CV-587PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Florence R. Lacy-MeKinney ("Lacy McKinney") appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. ("Taylor-Bean") on Taylor-Bean's action to foreclose on Lacy-MceKinney's mortgage that was insured by the Federal Housing Administration ("FHA"). 1 - On appeal, Lacy-McKinney raises two issues that we restate as:

I. _ Whether a mortgagee's compliance with federal mortgage servicing responsibilities is a condition precedent that may be raised as an affirmative defense to the foreclosure of an FHA-insured mortgage; and

II. Whether…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Jarboe v. Landmark Community Newspapers of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Eva Mae Roberts, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Cameron-Brown Company and Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Town of Avon v. West Central Conservancy DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Campbell v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Fonteno v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Pamela Webb v. City of Carmel, Carmel Clay Parks Building Corporation, and Carmel/Clay Board of Parks & RecreationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API