Legal Opinion

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority v. Gruzen Partnership

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 22, 1991PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’HERN, J.

This appeal concerns the doctrine of “nullum tempus occurrit regi ” (no time runs against the king). The question here is whether a general statute of limitations runs against today's sovereign, the State (or one of its agencies), when it asserts a claim in contract. We agree with the Appellate Division that no difference in principle can be found to warrant departure from the general rule in the context of a suit brought by the New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority (NJEFA) and Jersey City State College (JCSC) seeking to redress…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Willis v. Department of Conservation & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Merenoff v. MerenoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. P, T & L Construction Co. v. Commissioner, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Paula Maliandi v. Montclair State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  3. Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Borough of SomervilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. Mt. Lebanon School District v. W.R. Grace & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API