Legal Opinion
Knopfer v. Flournoy
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 1973No. Civ. 13950PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, J.
Appellants are members of the California Highway Patrol who are disabled by work-connected injuries. A provision of the workmen’s compensation law (Lab. Code, § 4800) declares that, in lieu of workmen’s compensation payments, disabled patrol members are entitled to leave of absence not exceeding one year without loss of salary. Section 4803 states that section 4800 “refers to temporary disability only. . . .”
In this mandate action appellants complain that the State Controller is making unauthorized deductions from the payments directed by section 4800. They take the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawthorn v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Boyd v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City & County of San Francisco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Department of Motor Vehicles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Harvey v. BoysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Kosowski v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- County of Alameda v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Leung v. Chinese Six CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.