Legal Opinion
Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 20, 1997No. 0184-87 M.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NEWMAN, Justice.
Caterpillar, Inc. (Employer) appeals from the award of unemployment compensation benefits to Donald Coddington, et al., Thomas Heath, Robert Hildebrand, Jr., and Wilson Hostetter (collectively, Claimants)1 pursuant to the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 751, et seq. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the Order of the Commonwealth Court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
During the spring of 1992, Caterpillar was in the process of negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rossi v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- County of Luzerne v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Spirnak v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Williams v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Ductmate Industries, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Navickas v. Unemployment Compensation Review BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Bruce v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Department of Corrections v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.