Legal Opinion
Spirnak v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 1989No. Appeal 873 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Smith,
Rose Spirnak (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed the referees denial of benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law). The Boards order is reversed.
Claimant was employed as a cashier by Pace Warehouse (Employer) from November 22, 1985, until her discharge on November 22, 1987. At the time in question, Employer had in force a company policy which mandated that any cash register overages or shortages in the amount of ten dollars or more would warrant a verbal warning for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Wright v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Lacomis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Placek v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Schwab v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by17 opinions
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Crabbe v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Brunson v. COM., UNEMPLOYMENT BD.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Webb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Chambersburg Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.