Legal Opinion

Williams v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1987No. Appeal, 321 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Gerald R. Williams (Petitioner) petitions for our review of an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) decision affirming a referees order denying benefits. We affirm.

Our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether constitutional rights were violated, errors of law committed or necessary findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa. C. S. §704.

The referee made the following findings of fact which are supported by substantial evidence:

1. For the purposes of this appeal, claimant was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dodson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Timpte, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Garner Tool and Die Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. Bailey v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Flores v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Petrone v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API