Legal Opinion

Aghnides v. Meyer's Co.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided January 21, 1954No. 1:07-m-00026PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

Plaintiff as inventor and owner of patents Nos. 2,210,846 and 2,316,832 sued the defendant, a retail merchant, for infringement of both patents. The first is the basic patent and the latter is an improvement thereon. The accused devices known as “Air Stream Aerator” sold by defendant were manufactured by Marshall Metal Products, Inc., of New York City. This suit was filed in this district March 3, 1953. Answer was filed May 8, 1953.

On June 3, 1953, defendant, the Meyer’s Company and Marshall Metal Products, Inc., brought a suit in the Southern District of New York for a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  5. Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brock v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  2. Aghnides v. SH Kress and CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1956
  3. Redman v. Stedman Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1960
  4. ESCO CORPORATION v. Tru-Rol Company, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  5. Marshall Metal Products, Inc. v. AghnidesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API