Legal Opinion

State v. Bekemans

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2013No. DA 11-0630PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH

¶1 Kamla L. Bekemans (Bekemans) appeals from her convictions in the Fifth Judicial District Court, Beaverhead County, of felony criminal endangerment; failing to use a lamp on a parked vehicle; failure to carry flares or other warning devices; failure to display warning devices on a disabled vehicle; operating a vehicle without insurance; and failure to park as close as practicable to the edge of the shoulder. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 Bekemans presents the following issues for review:

¶3 Issue One: Whether sufficient evidence supports Bekemans’ criminal endangerment conviction.

¶…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Whitlow v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Daniel Eugene Frazer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. State v. KouglMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. KouglMontana Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. T. RitesmanMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. City of Libby v. S. HubbardMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. B. BoydMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. J. KlineMontana Supreme Court · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API