Legal Opinion

In Re Hackler

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 22, 1983No. Bankruptcy 3-83-01139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIVE W. BARE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The question presented is whether a husband can claim a homestead exemption in property titled in his wife’s name, and in which he owns no interest. 11 U.S.C.A. § 522(b)(2) (1979); TenmCode Ann. § 26-2-301 (1980). The facts are not in dispute.

Gene Callawy Hackler and his spouse, Maude Louise Hackler, filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on July 20, 1983. 11 U.S.C.A. § 302 (1979). Under Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-301 (1980), each claimed a $3,750.00 exemption in real estate located in the city of Harriman. 1 Schedule B^4.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J. Kenneth Rhodes, Debtor v. Larry Stewart, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. State v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re SivleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  4. Stalcup v. City of GatlinburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Loftis v. LoftisTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Storey v. Bradford Furniture Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2000
  3. Lenore Berry Ross Storey, Debtor v. Bradford Furniture Company, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API