Stalcup v. City of Gatlinburg
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
From our consideration of the record and . briefs of the parties, we have concluded that the Court of Appeals correctly decided the issues presented on appeal. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals will be for publication as an appendix to this opinion. Mr. Justice Brock dissents and files a separate opinion in which Mr. Chief Justice Henry joins.
APPENDIX
MATHERNE, Judge.
The issue on appeal is the validity of Ordinance No. 190 of the City of Gatlin-burg, as amended, which levies a privilege tax of 1% upon the Gross Receipts of…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Phillips v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Melton v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Brentwood Liquors Corp. of Williamson Cty. v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- Riggs v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Civil Service Merit Board of City of Knoxville v. BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Oliver v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Knox County Education Ass'n v. Knox County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Hart v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.