Crossley v. Hartman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.
This case comes before us on an agreed statement of facts, as permitted by Maryland Rule 828 g. 1 If the appellants’ brief contains a statement of facts which the appellees accept as accurate and sufficient, no evidence in appellants’ appendix and no record references are necessary. Naughton v. Paul Jones & Co., 190 Md. 599, 59 A. 2d 496 (1948).
For purposes of this opinion, we have adopted the agreed statements of facts:
That prior to May 1964, Emma S. Hartman, as surviving joint tenant, was the fee simple owner of a tract of land con taining about 0.41 acres on the South side of State Route…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Naughton v. Paul Jones & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Hoffman v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Fuller v. J. B. Brewster & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- Wicklein v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Colonial Building & Loan Ass'n v. BodenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chen v. Bell-SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Wilson Brothers v. CooeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Iseli v. ClappCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Chen v. Bell-SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011