Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. Daskalas
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARFF, Judge:
This consolidated case arises out of the attempt of plaintiff Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) to condemn property located on Block 57 owned by defendants Burge, Barrows, and Barrows (Owners) and leased by defendants Daskalas and Pantelakis (Tenants). In Case No. 880302-CA, Owners appeal the trial court’s denial of (1) payment to them of interest on funds deposited by RDA with the court, and (2) expert witness fees and trial costs. In Case No. 870236-CA, Tenants appeal the trial court’s determinations (1) that Tenants had no compensable leasehold interest at…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Bodcaw Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Saunders v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Jarman v. Reagan Outdoor Advertising Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Board of County Commissioners v. FerrebeeUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Salt Lake City v. KunzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Karapanos v. Boardwalk Fries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.