Legal Opinion

In re Peierls Family Inter Vivos Trusts

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 4, 2013No. 13, 2013PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

This Opinion is one of a trilogy of opinions, issued concurrently, addressing issues arising out of Petitions, filed by members of the Peierls family, requesting the Court of Chancery to accept jurisdiction over, and then modify, thirteen (13) trusts created during the period 1953 through 2005. None of these trusts were created or settled under Delaware law, and none were ever administered in Delaware. The Petitioners sought relief under recently-adopted Court of Chancery Rules 100-103, inclusive, which were designed to create an orderly procedure for entertaining…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Randy v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Scion Breckenridge Managing Member, LLC v. ASB Allegiance Real Estate FundSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  4. Rollins International, Inc. v. International Hydronics Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips ElectronicsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  2. In re Activision Blizzard, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  3. In re Trust Under Will of Wallace B. Flint for the Benefit of Katherine F. ShadekCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  4. AgroFresh Inc. v. MirTech, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  5. In re Peierls Charitable Lead UnitrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API