Legal Opinion
AgroFresh Inc. v. MirTech, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 30, 2017No. Civ. No. 16-662-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, Senior District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On August 3, 2016, plaintiff AgroFresh Inc. (“AgroFresh” or “plaintiff’) filed a complaint against multiple defendants, including Dr. Nazir Mir (“Dr. Mir”), Mir-Tech, Inc. (“MirTeeh”), Decco U.S. Post-Harvest, Inc. (“Decco”), Essentiv LLC, and Cerexagri, Inc., d/b/a Decco Post-Harvest (collectively, “defendants”). The complaint arises out of a failed business relationship between AgroFresh and MirTeeh, and includes claims of ownership of certain intellectual property, breach of contract, tortious conduct, and patent infringement.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Estate of Osborn Ex Rel. Osborn v. KempSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Randy v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Deutsche Bank v. US Energy DevCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Dermatology Associates of San Antonio v. Oliver Street Dermatology Management LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
- In re: Zohar III, Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Kapila v. LewisDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
- Kelly v. DCC Technologies Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2024