Legal Opinion
Meisel v. Grunberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 31, 2009No. 07 Civ. 11610(PKL)PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Bruce Meisel (“Meisel” or “plaintiff’) brings this diversity action against Michael Grunberg (“Michael”), Fanny Grunberg (“Fanny”), and Ariel Grunberg (“Ariel”) (collectively, “defendants”) 1 for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation. Plaintiff claims that defendants misrepresented and omitted material facts in order to induce him into selling his minority interest in the 15 and 19 West 55th Street Realty Company (the “Partnership”) at a price significantly below actual value. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant…
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Reich v. LopezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Schubert v. City of RyeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- DDR Construction Services, Inc. v. Siemens Industry, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- McHale v. Citibank, N.A. (In Re the 1031 Tax Group, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.