Legal Opinion

Forster v. City of Pontiac

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1974No. Docket 18102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, P. J.

On July 17, 1973, the trial court rendered a judgment in this case invalidating a resolution of the Pontiac City Commission which ordered the vacation of an alley running behind plaintiffs’ business premises. The trial court’s judgment was based on a finding that the resolution was constitutionally infirm because it deprived plaintiffs of a substantial property right without due process of law or just compensation. Defendant city appeals as of right.

Plaintiffs are the owners of two adjoining lots in a subdivision fronting on Woodward Avenue in the City of Pontiac. Each of the lots is 20 feet…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Tomazewski v. Palmer Bee Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Horton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Phelps v. Stott Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Roberts v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Risko v. Grand Haven Charter Township Zoning Board of AppealsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Three Lakes Ass'n v. KesslerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF AZ. v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Dalton Township v. Muskegon County Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Dalton Twp. v. MUSKEGON RD. COMM'RSMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API