Legal Opinion

Tomazewski v. Palmer Bee Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1923No. Docket No. 22PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

This is a suit to restrain the vacating of a portion of Dyar avenue and certain public alleys and to vacate Norwalk avenue and relocate it in the village (now city) of Hamtramck, as ordered by the village council. Certain premises were subdivided east of the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee railroad, between Kenwood and Westminster (now Poland) avenues, and in the plat thereof as recorded, Dyar avenue, running north and south through the plat, and Norwalk avenue, running east from Dyar avenue to Dequindre street, and alleys paralleling Dyar avenue were dedicated to the public. Plaintiffs are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buhl v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Glasgow v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Kentucky Club v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  5. Horton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Krebs v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. Blanding v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ralph v. HazenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API