Phelps v. Stott Realty Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClakk, J.
The bill was filed to restore to public use an alley which had been vacated by defendant city and occupied in part by a building of the defendant Stott Realty Company. The bill was dismissed. Plaintiffs have appealed. The accompanying drawing will show the place in question.
In 1911, David Stott (Stott Realty Company being now successor in title) owned the easterly 18 feet of lot 4, and lot 5 on Michigan avenue and he owned lot 2, south of lot 5, on Wayne street. It will be seen that an alley separated his lots 5 and 2. Plaintiffs Ralph Phelps and John Adams then owned, and now own, severally,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Buhl v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Glasgow v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Kentucky Club v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Lee v. City of StratfordTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Puyper v. Pure Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Roberts v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re Hendricks to Vacate StreetMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.