Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 27, 1982No. ACM 23281PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

Tried by general court-martial with members, the accused was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of wrongfully transferring lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and, despite his pleas, of attempting to wrongfully transfer methaqualone, in violation of Articles 92 and 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 880. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for one year, forfeiture of $300.00 per month for one year, and reduction to airman basic.

The attempted transfer specification is worded:

In that AIRMAN FIRST…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MarshallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. Gonzalez-RodriguezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. SilvasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. ChaslesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. DagenaisU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  4. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. LevinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API