Legal Opinion

United States v. Dagenais

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 22, 1983No. ACM 23714PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The accused stands convicted of attempting to violate a lawful general regulation by possessing a substance he believed to be lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), in violation of Article 80, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. § 880. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for seven months, forfeiture of $200.00 per month for three months, and reduction to airman.

I

Initially, the accused contends the trial judge erred by refusing to reopen the pretrial investigation. Article 32(b), U.C.M.J. The circumstances giving rise to this request…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. John Nuccio, Rosario Lupo, and William CurcuratoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. LedbetterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. Donald Eugene ColyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. ChestnutUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. DouglasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API