Legal Opinion
Lazarus v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 12, 1997No. 2 CA-IC 96-0045PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
The issue in this case is whether a medical insurance premium an employer pays as a fringe benefit of employment should be included in calculating an injured employee’s average monthly wage under the Workers’ Compensation Act, A.R.S. §§ 23-901 to 23-1091 (the Act). The administrative law judge (ALJ) concluded it should not. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. .
BACKGROUND
The parties stipulated to the following facts. Petitioner Joanne Lazarus injured her wrist in July 1993, while working as a vocational counselor for Community Psychology Education…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Aitken v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Ex Parte MurraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Moorehead v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc./Wausau Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc./Wausau Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc./Wausau Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013