Legal Opinion

Layman v. State Unemployment Compensation Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1941PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a decree of the circuit court sustaining an order of the State Unemployment Compensation Commission which denied in part the plaintiff's claim for unemployment, compensation. The case involves the construction of § 7 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (8 O. C. L. A. § 126-707) and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the commission’s findings. Section 7 reads as follows:

“Benefits in seasonal and irregular employment, (a) Whenever the commission finds that on account of seasonal conditions, it is highly impracticable or impossible for the employer to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Froehly v. HartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Forbes v. Ottumwa Sand Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Connors v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sunshine Dairy v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Gouge v. DavidOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Curly's Dairy, Inc. v. State Department of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Holman Transfer Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In re State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API