Layman v. State Unemployment Compensation Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a decree of the circuit court sustaining an order of the State Unemployment Compensation Commission which denied in part the plaintiff's claim for unemployment, compensation. The case involves the construction of § 7 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (8 O. C. L. A. § 126-707) and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the commission’s findings. Section 7 reads as follows:
“Benefits in seasonal and irregular employment, (a) Whenever the commission finds that on account of seasonal conditions, it is highly impracticable or impossible for the employer to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Froehly v. HartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Forbes v. Ottumwa Sand Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Connors v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sunshine Dairy v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Gouge v. DavidOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Curly's Dairy, Inc. v. State Department of AgricultureOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Holman Transfer Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- In re State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.