Vavrosky Maccoll Olson Busch & Pfeifer PC v. Employment Department
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Employer seeks review of a final order of the Employment Department (department) denying its request for relief from charges under ORS 657.471(5)(b) for unemployment benefits paid to its former employee. Employer assigns error to the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) interpretation of ORS 657.471(5)(b). We affirm.
Employer is a law firm that employed claimant as an attorney from November 2002 through November 2004. During his employment, the attorney was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and manic depressive syndrome. Ultimately, his medical condition and the medication he took to treat it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- COST SECURITY v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Providence Health & Services-Oregon v. MancusoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023