Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bierring v. Swearingen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 7, 1946No. 46835PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hale, J.-

Plaintiff in his petition alleges that Clyde S. Swearingen had been and was at the time of filing the petition engaged in the practice of barbering in this state without a license; that he had failed to apply for a renewal of his license prior to June 1, 1943; that he had failed to apply for and receive a reinstatement of his license as by law provided; that his license was not'renewed on June 30, 1943, and that he has had no license since that time and he is not now properly licensed to practice barbering in this state bnt is illegally 'engaged in the practice of barbering without…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilchrist v. BierringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Smith v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Craven v. BierringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. State v. OtterholtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co. v. LiddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Socony Vacuum Oil Company v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. State v. GarlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Banks v. CarrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Kraetsch v. StullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API