Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Craven v. Bierring

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 17, 1936No. 43662PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiff-appellant has been engaged in the practice of dentistry since 1906. The last ten years he has confined his practice to plate work only. He owns and maintains a chain of five dental offices in Iowa. It has been his practice to advertise extensively through the newspapers by means of narratives or short stories extolling the superiority of his work, illus trating his advertisement with a photograph or cut of his plate work. Special sales were featured and special prices quoted. Attractive signs were used at his several offices. Each office was in charge of a regular licensed dentist…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gilchrist v. BierringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Elk River Coal & Lumber Co. v. FunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Sherman v. State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Burlington & Summit Apartments, Midland Mortgage Co. v. ManolatoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API