Legal Opinion

Fjeldsted v. Cox

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1980No. 16428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

This appeal is from an order revoking plaintiff’s driver’s license for his refusal to take a blood alcohol test. The district court found (1) that plaintiff had been properly requested to take a chemical test pursuant to the Implied Consent Statute, § 41-6-44.-10, Utah Code Ann. (1953), as amended, following his arrest at the scene of an automobile accident; (2) that plaintiff had refused to submit to the test; (3) that the Implied Consent Statute was properly explained to him and that he had been informed he had no right to an attorney, and (4) that plaintiff had admittedly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holman v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Beck v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Muir v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Village of Cary v. JakubekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Heles v. South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
  3. People v. OkunAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API