Legal Opinion

Muir v. Cox

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1980No. 16511PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Plaintiff appeals from a de novo review of a decision of the Utah State Driver’s License Division (hereinafter “Division”) wherein the district court denied plaintiff’s petition to reinstate his driver’s license. In so ruling, the court held that plaintiff had refused to submit to a breathalyzer examination pursuant to Utah’s Implied Consent Law.1

On November 22, 1978, at approximately 1:00 a.m. plaintiff was involved in a traffic accident in Salt Lake City, Utah. One of the investigating officers, patrolman Hunt, suspected that plaintiff had been drinking and requested that he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Holman v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LeavittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Decker v. RolfeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  3. Lee v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Fjeldsted v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Larson v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API