Legal Opinion
Barringer v. Ray
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1956No. 3902PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court, Badt, J.:
The main question presented in this appeal is whether the respondent Ida Angelot Ray, as surviving wife of Carl Ray, deceased, was bound by her alleged election to take under the will of the testator to the end that she was estopped from seeking specific performance of an antenuptial agreement. The learned district judge rejected such defenses of election and estoppel in pais, and we agree with his conclusion. Certain other assignments of error are likewise disposed of in this opinion.
On April 19, 1946, an antenuptial agreement was entered into between the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Hardeman v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Noyes v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Willard v. ShekellMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Sackett v. Farmers State Bank of BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Bankers Trust Company, a Corporation v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation, and the Century Insurance Company, Limited, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- McColl v. SchererNevada Supreme Court · 1957
- Nevada Land & Mortgage Co. v. Hidden Wells Ranch, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Barringer v. GundersonNevada Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.