Legal Opinion

Dunville v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The only question is: Was the deceased, George Dunville, subject tO' the Workmen’s Compensation Act at the time of his injury? He was a resident of St. Louis, Missouri, and never had been a resident of Wisconsin. The respondent, Kahlenberg Brothers Company, is a corporation engaged in manufacturing gas engines and located in the city of Two Rivers, Wisconsin. In May, 1935, Mr. Dunville called on Kahlenberg Brothers Company and interviewed some of its officers with a view of securing employment by said company as a salesman. No position was then open. Thereafter, there was some correspondence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Miller Scrap Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Val Blatz Brewing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Interstate Power Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Wandersee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Paper Company v. TidwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. International Paper Company v. TidwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Mallard v. F. M. Bohannon, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API