Legal Opinion
JEAN
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3472PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 373
(A.G. 2002) Interim Decision #3472 In re Melanie Beaucejour JEAN, Respondent1 File A25 452 154 Decided May 2, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General (1) The 30-day period set forth in
8 C.F.R. § 3.38(b) (2002) for filing an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals is mandatory and jurisdictional, and it begins to run upon the issuance of a final disposition in the case. (2) The Board of Immigration Appeals’ authority under
8 C.F.R. § 3.1(c) (2002) to certify cases to itself in its discretion is limited to exceptional circumstances, and is not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Baljinder Singh SANGHA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- J-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- CASTRO-TUMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Saintha v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Ahmed Ali v. Deborah Achim, Michael Chertoff, and Alberto Gonzales, Ahmed Ali v. Alberto GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Vasiliy Ostapovich Romanishyn v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Mejia v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.